Of course, both WebRTC SFU are amazing work!! I'm using both. From these points, janus is suitable for webinar, jitsi is for web conference. Jitsi last-n + VP8 simulcasting has the very good performance for web conference For the video format, janus recording is per video streaming, jitsi is for mixed video conference by using chrome headlesss + ffmpeg(alsa, libxcb). The scalability of the current Jitsi Video Bridge(20181007) is poor because of having no local recording file(I'm not sure of this.). I think that janus is better for webinar(web seminar), and jitsi is better for web conference system. You can stream videos using the provided RTMP URI and also use the live feed in other applications. About the details of setup for this docker image, you should read the official docs carefully. If you need any request about this repo, free to contact me. I try to deal with such a chage as much as I can. rtmp-server & cd rtmp-server npm init npm install node-media-server.

So, as the official docs says, some minor modification of the middleware library versions happens frequently. js proxy server in under 10 minutes in this beginner friendly tutorial. Janus Gateway is still under active development phase. This is a docker image for Janus Webrtc Gateway. Janus-webrtc-gateway-docker - Perfect Docker Image for Media Streaming Expert User (

Rtmp server windows 10